Q4 2017 · IDX · Mar 12, 2018

BFIN Did Operating Cash Flow Really Get Worse in 2017, or Just Get Reclassified?

Full-year net income grew 48.7% to Rp1,187,510M and a fourth bond tranche - the largest yet at Rp2.165 trillion - was already in motion before the year's books even closed, but the audited statements quietly moved joint-financing cash flows from financing into operating activities, making this backlog's own operating-cash-flow metric no longer comparable to what was reported a year ago - and a decade-old Supreme Court order to hand back 111.8 million shares resurfaced in the footnotes for the first time in six posts.

A Different Cash Flow Statement for the Same Year

Two posts ago, this backlog flagged a funding cadence problem: a company drawing down and upsizing credit facilities one quarter at a time, with operating cash flow swinging to -Rp1,241,164M for the first nine months of 2017. The audited full-year statements, now available, show operating cash flow of -Rp2,335,063M for 2017 - a number that reads like the funding-cadence story got dramatically worse in the fourth quarter alone. It didn't, not entirely. Buried in the fine print of the same cash flow statement is a reclassification that moves the goalposts: "joint financing" cash flows (Rp757,731M received, Rp1,463,067M disbursed in the 2016 comparative alone) have shifted from financing activities to operating activities between this year's annual report and last year's. Under the classification the company itself used twelve months ago, full-year 2016 operating cash flow was +Rp231,682M; under this year's restated comparative column, the identical 2016 figure is -Rp456,175M. Same company, same fiscal year, same audited numbers underneath - a Rp687,857M swing purely from where one line item sits on the page.

None of this changes what actually happened to the business in 2017: net income grew 48.7% to Rp1,187,510M, new financing kept outrunning collections, and the company kept raising fresh capital to fund it (see Beyond the Usual for the fourth bond tranche already underway). But it does mean the operating-cash-flow trend this backlog has tracked across five consecutive posts - swinging from positive in 2015 to a widening negative run through 2017 - now has a discontinuity baked into it that a reader comparing this year's -Rp2,335,063M full-year operating cash flow against last year's reported +Rp231,682M would never spot without opening both years' cash flow statements side by side.

The Prescription

Publish a one-line reconciliation whenever a cash flow classification changes, the same discipline this blog asked for after the 2016 write-off-policy change: if joint financing now belongs in operating activities because that better reflects the economics of the business (a defensible position - the cash disbursed and collected under joint financing agreements funds the same lending activity as the company's own book), say so in a sentence, and show what the prior year would have looked like on the new basis. The company already restates one comparative year internally to do this reclassification; publishing that same restated 2015 or earlier figure once, in a footnote, would let a reader anchor the multi-year operating-cash-flow trend on one consistent basis instead of discovering the discontinuity by cross-referencing old filings.

What it should stop doing: framing results to the market around the income statement's growth rate without reconciling it against how much of that growth is being financed by ever-larger borrowings rather than cash the business generates itself. Profit before tax rose 45.2% and net income rose 48.7% this year - genuinely strong numbers - while the business consumed more operating cash than it has in any year in this backlog, even before the reclassification above is considered. A lender growing this fast is supposed to consume cash funding new receivables; the risk isn't the negative number, it's a narrative that never has to reconcile against that financing dependence (see the fourth bond tranche and the Debt-to-Equity Ratio» move below).

Key Financial Metrics

Fiscal year 2017 vs. fiscal year 2016

FX: Rp13,548 = USD 1 (31 December 2017, per the company's own financial statements). Both periods are converted at this same rate for comparability; it is not a historical rate for the 2016 column.

Metric FY2017 (IDR) FY2017 (USD) FY2016 (IDR) YoY
Total Income ("Net Revenue" equivalent) Rp4,042,317M ~$298.4M Rp3,227,109M ✅ +25.3%
Profit Before Income Tax ("Operating Income" equivalent) Rp1,487,786M ~$109.8M Rp1,024,963M ✅ +45.2%
Net Income Rp1,187,510M ~$87.7M Rp798,365M ✅ +48.7%
Operating Cash Flow -Rp2,335,063M ~-$172.4M -Rp456,175M* ⚠️ deepened sharply, and not on a like-for-like basis with the +Rp231,682M previously reported for FY2016 - see above
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents Rp225,203M ~$16.6M Rp165,388M ✅ +36.2%

*The FY2016 comparative shown here is this year's annual report's own restated figure, using the reclassified cash flow presentation - not the +Rp231,682M this backlog originally reported for FY2016, which used the classification in effect at the time. See above for why the two aren't comparable.

Profit before tax remains the closest real operating-income equivalent. No investor presentation or earnings-call transcript was located for this quarter, so this post relies entirely on the audited consolidated financial statements inside the company's 2017 integrated annual report.

Balance sheet metric Dec 2017 (IDR) Dec 2017 (USD) Dec 2016 (IDR) Change
Total Assets Rp16,483,273M ~$1,216.7M Rp12,476,256M ✅ +32.1%
Net Investments in Finance Lease Rp9,435,315M ~$696.6M Rp7,121,175M ✅ +32.5%
Consumer Financing Receivables (net) Rp5,916,685M ~$436.7M Rp4,462,184M ✅ +32.6%
Total Liabilities Rp11,579,007M ~$854.7M Rp8,221,572M ⚠️ +40.8%
Fund Borrowings (net) Rp6,819,052M ~$503.4M Rp4,690,939M ⚠️ +45.4%
Securities Issued (bonds + MTNs, net) Rp3,909,411M ~$288.6M Rp2,965,295M ⚠️ +31.8%
Total Equity Rp4,904,266M ~$362.0M Rp4,254,684M ✅ +15.3%

This is a full fiscal year against a full fiscal year, so no interim-period seasonality caveat is needed the way it was for the two nine-month posts earlier in this backlog - vehicle and equipment financing demand here tracks Indonesia's broader economic cycle rather than any pattern within the calendar year.

Key Operational Metrics

  • Net investment mix: finance lease is 61.5% of the combined finance lease + consumer financing net book (Rp9,435,315M of Rp15,352,000M), up from September's 60.8% and December 2016's 61.5% - essentially back to where the ratio was a year ago after drifting down mid-year, not a continuation of the multi-year mix shift in either direction this quarter.
  • Receivables overdue more than 90 days (calculated from the filed statement's own overdue-day disclosure, the same convention used every quarter in this backlog): finance lease improved to 0.58% of gross investment (Rp67,459M of Rp11,724,499M), down from September's 0.74% and even below December 2016's 0.61% - a genuine fourth-quarter reversal. Consumer financing also improved from September's peak but stayed above a year ago: 1.04% (Rp83,875M of Rp8,041,032M), down from September's 1.10% but still above December 2016's 0.90% - three quarters of deterioration followed by one quarter of partial relief, not yet a clean reversal (see Beyond the Usual).
  • Debt-to-Equity Ratio (DER)»: ~2.19x on a gross basis (fund borrowings plus securities issued, both net of unamortized costs, against equity), up sharply from September's ~1.99x and December 2016's ~1.80x. The company's own disclosed "Gearing Ratio" (net debt over total capital, its own narrower measure) moved the same direction: 2.2x, up from 1.8x a year earlier, still comfortably inside the regulatory ceiling of 10x but the largest single-year jump in this backlog.
  • Branch network: 342 outlets (218 branches, 124 kiosks) as of December 2017, up 12.1% from 305 a year earlier - the branch buildout accelerated from September's 321 outlets.
  • Headcount: 9,884 employees, up 10.5% from 8,941 a year earlier - 61% of them permanent staff, per the company's own disclosure.
  • Geographic mix: 52.7% of the year's revenue came from Java, with Sumatera (18.6%) and Sulawesi (16.8%) next and Kalimantan at 10.8% - essentially unchanged from every prior post in this backlog.
  • Earnings per share: Rp79 basic and diluted, up 51.9% from Rp52 (both restated for the May 2017 stock split) - growing slightly faster than net income itself (+48.7%), a gap explained almost entirely by the trivial non-controlling-interest sliver the new subsidiary discussed in Beyond the Usual introduces, rather than any change in the outstanding share count.
  • Return on average assets/equity: the company's own disclosed ROAA and ROAE were 10.3% and 25.9% for 2017, up from 8.5% and 19.3% in 2016 - both the strongest readings in this backlog, and a genuine return to disclosed figures after September's estimate-only quarter.
  • Not available this quarter: no investor presentation or earnings-call transcript has been located for FY2017, so this post relies entirely on the audited financial statements and the annual report's own management discussion and analysis.

Two Segments, One Balance Sheet

Finance lease and consumer financing remain the two reported segments, plus the residual "others" category, which now also carries a small new fintech subsidiary alongside unallocated finance income and corporate items (see Beyond the Usual).

Finance lease - segment income of Rp2,313,751M for the year, up 35.5% year-over-year, on segment assets of Rp9,474,484M (up 32.5% YoY). Growth decelerated slightly from nine months' 37.0%, but this remains the segment carrying the business.

Consumer financing - segment income of Rp1,683,807M, up 13.1% year-over-year on segment assets of Rp5,947,762M (up 32.3% YoY). This growth rate accelerated again from nine months' 9.2%, the second straight quarter of acceleration flagged in this backlog, even as the segment's own overdue-90-day ratio stayed elevated versus a year ago (see Key Operational Metrics).

Comparing the two: finance lease still grows more than two-and-a-half times faster than consumer financing on the income line, but the gap kept narrowing through the fourth quarter, continuing what the September post first identified as a genuinely new pattern rather than a one-quarter blip. Segment assets, by contrast, grew at almost identical rates for both segments (32.5% and 32.3%) - the divergence is showing up entirely in income growth, not balance-sheet growth, which suggests consumer financing's book is starting to earn a better yield on a similarly-sized asset base rather than simply growing faster.

Beyond the Usual

A decade-old Supreme Court order to return 111.8 million shares resurfaced in the footnotes

The company's litigation note discloses a legal dispute with PT Aryaputra Teguharta (APT) dating back to a lawsuit filed in 2003, in which the Supreme Court of Indonesia's final and binding Judicial Review decision (No. 240/PK/Pdt/2006, dated 20 February 2007) ordered the company and its directors to return 111,804,732 of the company's own shares to APT. The decision was initially ruled "non-executable" by the Central Jakarta District Court in 2007, then ruled executable again in 2014, then in 2017 ruled non-executable once more because the shares in question had already been sold and were no longer in the defendants' control. On 20 November 2017, the company itself filed a Judicial Review petition with the Supreme Court, arguing that the 2007 decision against it directly contradicts a separate, later Supreme Court decision (No. 115/PK/Pdt/2007) that rejected a near-identical pledged-share claim brought by a different party, PT Ongko Multicorpora, against the same company. Management states it doesn't believe the case will materially affect operations before the independent auditor's report date. This dispute has been disclosed in the company's audited financial statements in prior years too, but it has not appeared anywhere in this backlog's first six posts - a material contingent liability, still legally unresolved after more than a decade, that a reader following this company through its financial statements alone would have missed entirely until the company's own new court filing brought it back into this year's footnotes.

The operating cash flow metric this backlog has tracked all year quietly changed definition

As described above, the audited 2017 cash flow statement classifies joint-financing cash receipts and disbursements under operating activities, while the same line items were classified under financing activities in every prior year's statements in this backlog, including the one reported for the same fiscal year 2016 just twelve months ago. The shift moves the reported FY2016 comparative from +Rp231,682M operating cash flow (as originally filed) to -Rp456,175M (as restated this year) - a swing large enough to flip the year's own operating cash flow from positive to negative depending on which version is used. No note in the filing calls out or reconciles this specific reclassification (Note 38's disclosed reclassifications cover balance sheet and income statement line items only, not the cash flow statement). The change itself is defensible - joint financing does fund the same core lending activity as the company's own book - but a reader tracking this metric quarter to quarter, the way this backlog has, needs to know the ruler moved.

Two genuine new business lines are now live: a fintech subsidiary and a sharia permit

The company established PT Finansial Integrasi Teknologi (FIT), a 99.96%-owned peer-to-peer lending subsidiary, on 15 September 2017 - the source of the small non-controlling interest now appearing on the balance sheet for the first time in this backlog. FIT was still applying for its operating license as of this report's publication date and has no operations yet, but it's the first move anywhere in this backlog into a digital-lending structure distinct from finance lease and consumer financing. The sharia expansion flagged as a subsequent event last quarter also became real: on 15 January 2018 OJK approved the company's Sharia Supervisory Board members, and on 15 February 2018 it granted an operating permit for a dedicated sharia business unit - a governance announcement last quarter is now an actual license to originate sharia-compliant financing. Two distinct new business lines going live in the same reporting window is more than a routine update, and both are worth tracking for how much of future bookings they eventually represent.

The United Tractors working-capital loan rose again, to Rp536,167M (67% of its Rp800,000M ceiling) - a fifth straight quarterly high, continuing the repay-then-redraw pattern flagged repeatedly in this backlog.

A fourth bond tranche - the largest yet - was already being arranged before the year's own books closed

The third 2017 bond tranche (Rp835,000M) closed as planned; as a subsequent event, a fourth tranche of Rp2,165,000M - more than double any prior single tranche - was already in process for an early-March 2018 listing, continuing the funding-cadence pattern flagged twice before in this backlog.

Off-balance-sheet joint financing ticked up for the first time in over a year

Joint-financing and channeling commitments rose 8.2% from September to Rp523,961M - still down 58.4% year-over-year, but the first quarterly increase after five straight quarters of decline.

Impairment provisioning grew faster than last quarter's pace, but still trails the combined loan book

Provisioning grew 10.8% for the year (versus 4.5% at nine months), still behind the 23.4% growth in the combined gross loan book, though the gap narrowed in Q4 alongside the same-quarter improvement in overdue ratios.

Target Valuation Range

Market cap ~Rp10,175,781M (~$751.1M) at ~8.6x full-year P/E and ~2.07x P/B - fairly valued, tilting toward fully priced for the first time in this backlog; the stock re-rated faster than earnings grew this quarter, and the cash-flow and funding-cadence questions above are the reasons a reader shouldn't extrapolate the prior multiple compression in a straight line.

Shares closed at Rp680 on 29 December 2017, up 21.4% from September's Rp560 close - both figures already on the post-May 2017 stock split basis with no further adjustment needed. The move wasn't a smooth climb: the price jumped to roughly Rp700 in October (coinciding with the syndicated-loan upsize and strong nine-month results reported in early November) before easing back slightly into year-end. Using 14,964,383,620 shares outstanding net of treasury stock (unchanged all year) and the Rp680 closing price:

Market cap buildup Q4 2017
Share price (period-end) Rp680
Shares outstanding 14,964,383,620
Market capitalization Rp10,175,781M (~$751.1M)
Book value (total equity) Rp4,904,266M
Peer-multiple sanity check Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Change
P/E ~7.7x ~8.6x (full-year basic EPS Rp79) up
P/B ~1.7x ~2.07x up

Both multiples expanded meaningfully from September's ~7.7x P/E and ~1.7x P/B - the share price grew faster in the fourth quarter than trailing earnings did, the opposite of the compression seen in the prior two quarters. A full multi-year DCF still isn't included here: this is now the first genuine two-full-fiscal-year comparison in this backlog (2016 against 2017), still short of the several years of stable cost-of-funds history a real terminal-growth assumption would need. The peer-multiple read remains the honest lens for now: a business still growing net income near 50% a year at under 9x trailing earnings isn't obviously expensive, but the re-rating this quarter has used up some of the margin of safety the "reasonably priced" framing in the last post rested on - and that framing didn't yet account for either the newly surfaced litigation or the funding-cadence pattern both described in Beyond the Usual.


PT BFI Finance Indonesia Tbk's audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended 31 December 2017 (with comparative figures for 31 December 2016, as reclassified), authorized for issuance 19 February 2018, together with the accompanying management discussion and analysis inside the company's 2017 integrated annual report.