Q3 2016 · IDX · Nov 4, 2016

BBRI Its Core Capital Ratio Jumped 2.3 Points in One Quarter. Total Capital Barely Moved.

BRI's Tier 1 CAR jumped from 18.56% to 20.88% in Q3 2016 - but Total CAR actually slipped slightly, from 22.10% to 21.88%, because the whole move was a reclassification of existing Tier 2 reserves into Tier 1, not new capital. It's the second capital-ratio inflation episode this year, and this time the total didn't even improve.

A Second Capital Jump, and This Time Total Capital Didn't Even Move

This is BRI's 9M 2016 report (period ended September 30, 2016), the second capital-ratio surprise in as many quarters after the H1 2016 post found a one-time land revaluation adding over $1 billion to equity and pushing Tier 1 CAR» up nearly three points. That post's whole point was that a capital ratio can jump without the bank actually earning anything new. This quarter delivers almost the identical lesson through a completely different mechanism: Tier 1 CAR jumped again, from 18.56% to 20.88% - a 2.32-point move in a single quarter - not from a fresh appraisal or a capital raise, but because BRI reclassified Rp15,093,057M of appropriated reserves out of Tier 2 capital and into retained earnings, which counts as Tier 1. The filed statement's own note confirms the mechanics plainly: the appropriated-reserves line, which stood at Rp15,093,057M as of December 31, 2015, is zero as of September 30, 2016.

The tell is in Total CAR», which didn't rise at all - it actually slipped slightly, from 22.10% to 21.88%. If BRI's capital position had genuinely strengthened this quarter, both ratios would move together; instead Tier 1 rose by exactly as much as Tier 2 fell, and the combined number went nowhere. That's about as clean a confirmation as a reader could ask for that this is an internal reshuffle between capital tiers, not new capital entering the bank. Net income attributable to owners, meanwhile, grew a modest 2.9% year-over-year for the nine months - a business performing about the same as it has all year, dressed up in a headline capital ratio that looks like it jumped by more than two points.

None of this is hidden - the presentation itself states the reclassification driver directly in a footnote beneath the ratio table, exactly the kind of plain disclosure the H1 2016 post asked for after the land revaluation. But a reader skimming only the Tier 1 CAR line for a second straight quarter would conclude BRI's capital base is compounding upward fast, when the more honest read - Total CAR - shows a bank whose actual capital adequacy has been flat to slightly down since June.

The Prescription

BRI should keep disclosing capital-ratio moves exactly as transparently as it did here - the reclassification footnote sits right beneath the ratio table, not buried in an appendix, and a reader who checks both Tier 1 and Total CAR side by side (as this post does) gets the full picture in seconds. That's good practice worth continuing.

What BRI should stop doing: leading the "Financial Highlights" slide with Tier 1 CAR as the headline capital metric. This is now the second consecutive quarter a large, favorably-framed Tier 1 jump has masked a capital base that isn't actually growing the way the headline number implies - the H1 2016 post flagged the same pattern when a one-time land revaluation drove that quarter's move, and this quarter's Tier 2-to-Tier 1 reclassification is a different mechanism producing the identical optics. Two quarters running of "Tier 1 jumped, Total CAR didn't" is no longer a one-off worth a caveat - it's a pattern in how BRI's own presentation chooses what to headline, and management should switch the slide's lead metric to Total CAR before a third occurrence makes the pattern look deliberate rather than coincidental.

Key Financial Metrics

9M 2016 vs. 9M 2015 (P&L, cumulative Jan-Sep, consolidated), and Sep 2016 vs. Jun 2016 (balance sheet, consolidated)

FX: IDR 13,051.00 = USD 1 (the rate the filed statement itself discloses for September 30, 2016).

Metric 9M 2016 (IDR) 9M 2016 (USD) 9M 2015 (IDR) YoY
Net Interest and Sharia Income - net ("Net Revenue" equivalent) Rp50,084,961M ~$3,838M Rp42,863,740M ✅ +16.9%
Other operating income Rp11,559,650M ~$886M Rp8,508,543M ✅ +35.9%
Other operating expense Rp39,418,477M ~$3,020M Rp29,979,624M ⚠️ +31.5%
Operating Income (Income from Operations) Rp22,226,134M ~$1,703M Rp21,392,659M ➖ +3.9%
Net Income (attributable to owners) Rp18,950,861M ~$1,452M Rp18,416,784M ➖ +2.9%
Total Comprehensive Income (attributable to owners) Rp35,572,718M ~$2,725M Rp17,204,302M ✅ +106.8%
EPS (basic, actual 9-month) Rp775.16 ~$0.0594 Rp746.55 ➖ +3.8%
Balance sheet metric Sep 2016 (IDR) Sep 2016 (USD) Jun 2016 (IDR) QoQ
Total Assets Rp931,693,351M ~$71.39B Rp907,842,929M ✅ +2.6%
Loans (gross, incl. sharia financing and finance lease) Rp630,441,805M ~$48.31B Rp597,744,828M ✅ +5.5%
Total Deposits (Demand + Savings + Time) Rp673,672,859M ~$51.62B Rp663,603,919M ➖ +1.5%
Total Liabilities Rp790,752,391M ~$60.59B Rp774,179,097M ➖ +2.1%
Total Equity (attributable to owners) Rp140,604,529M ~$10.77B Rp133,350,861M ✅ +5.4%
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents (per cash flow statement) Rp140,819,682M ~$10.79B Rp145,824,539M ⚠️ -3.4%

Total cash and cash equivalents, disclosed directly by the filed cash flow statement, is used instead of free cash flow. Total Equity is flagged ✅ this quarter (unlike the ⚠️ in the H1 2016 post) because the quarter-on-quarter growth this time is genuine retained-earnings accumulation plus the ongoing mark-up on available-for-sale securities - there's no fresh one-time revaluation entry in Q3.

Standalone Q3 2016 figures (9M 2016 minus the already-recorded H1 2016 figures from the H1 2016 post) show net income of Rp6,775,322M (~$519M) - up 14.2% quarter-on-quarter from Q2's Rp5,930,053M. The trailing sequence by quarter, per this series' own recorded figures: Rp6,143bn (Q1'15) → Rp5,802bn (Q2'15) → Rp6,471bn (Q3'15) → Rp6,981bn (Q4'15) → Rp6,245bn (Q1'16) → Rp5,930bn (Q2'16) → Rp6,775bn (Q3'16) - a genuine H2 recovery after the Q1-to-Q2 dip, continuing the seasonal shape both 2015 and 2016 have now shown.

Tier 1 CAR jumped 2.3 points this quarter. Total CAR fell slightly. That gap is the whole story - one number measures an internal reshuffle, the other measures the bank's actual capital position.

Key Operational Metrics

  • CASA ratio»: 57.61% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 56.89% (Bank, Jun 2016) - continuing its multi-quarter improvement.
  • Loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR)»: 90.68% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 90.03% (Bank, Jun 2016) - now above management's own revised 2016 target band (+/- 90%) for a second straight quarter.
  • Net Interest Margin (NIM)»: 8.41% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 8.43% (Bank, Jun 2016) - essentially flat, ending a three-quarter improvement streak with a rounding-level dip.
  • ROA» (before tax): 3.59% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 3.68% (Bank, Jun 2016) - down slightly.
  • ROE» (Tier 1): 23.97% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 25.24% (Bank, Jun 2016) - down again, mechanically so: the same Tier 1 capital base that just grew from the reclassification discussed above is the denominator, so a falling ROE this quarter reflects a bigger capital base, not a weaker business.
  • CAR» (Total): 21.88% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 22.10% (Bank, Jun 2016) - the flat-to-down number that unmasks this quarter's Tier 1 jump (see above).
  • NPL ratio - gross: 2.22% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 2.31% (Bank, Jun 2016) - improved, back to Q1's level.
  • NPL ratio - net: 0.57% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 0.60% (Bank, Jun 2016) - a small improvement.
  • Cost-to-income (BOPO»): 72.41% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 72.40% (Bank, Jun 2016) - flat, holding at the elevated level this series has tracked since Q1 2016's provisioning-driven jump.
  • Cost of Fund: 3.89% (Bank, Sep 2016) vs 3.96% (Bank, Jun 2016) - improved again, still benefiting from the CASA gain above.
  • NPL coverage ratio: management's own "Key Take Aways" slide states coverage improved from 150.0% (9M 2015) to 166.6% (9M 2016) - the direct payoff of the aggressive provisioning this series flagged starting in the Q1 2016 post: loan-loss provisioning grew 61.4% year-over-year (bank-only, 9M) against 19.3% gross-operating-income growth, again outrunning revenue, but this quarter comes with the clearest disclosed payoff figure yet for that trade-off.
  • Net Open Position: 10.56% (Sep 2016), up sharply from 3.29% (Jun 2016) and 5.13% (Mar 2016)» - see Beyond the Usual below.
  • Micro loans: Rp204.8 trillion outstanding (Bank), +20.3% year-over-year, with borrowers reaching 8.6 million. New KUR» loans reached Rp46.3 trillion and 3.5 million borrowers, up from Rp39.7 trillion and 3.0 million a quarter earlier.
  • TerasBRI: loan and deposit growth of 28.0% and 24.0% year-over-year respectively, now contributing 10.1% of total Micro loans and 4.7% of total Micro deposits - essentially unchanged from Q2's 10.1% and 4.6%, a plateau rather than continued acceleration.
  • BRILink (third-party agents using BRI's e-banking infrastructure via fee-sharing): agent count grew 93.4% YoY to 69,552, transaction count grew 357.1% YoY, and transaction volume grew 329.8% YoY to Rp87.5 trillion - still the fastest-growing distribution channel this series has tracked for BRI, though the YoY growth rates are decelerating from Q2's 101%/420%/390% as the base gets larger.
  • Branch network: 10,639 total outlets (+88 vs Sep 2015), including 5,368 BRI Units and 2,556 Teras BRI locations.

A seasonal note: the Q3 rebound above matches the same second-half recovery pattern the H1 2016 post flagged as a developing multi-year shape in BRI's earnings - both 2015 and 2016 now show a Q1-to-Q2 trough followed by Q3-Q4 recovery.

Loan Book by Segment

The filed statement this quarter is the abbreviated OJK interim publication - the same short-form structure the Q1 2016 post worked with - rather than the fuller audited-format statements the H1 2016 post had access to. That means Note 40's profit-by-segment breakdown (Micro/Retail/Corporate/Other/Subsidiaries) isn't available this quarter, so a segment-level income comparison isn't possible here - only the loan-book-by-lending-category data management's own presentation discloses.

  • Micro: Rp204.8 trillion, +20.3% YoY, with NPL improving to 1.34% (from 1.44% a year earlier) - the segment's asset quality getting cleaner as it keeps growing, the opposite of the wobble the FY2015 post flagged in Q4 2015.
  • Consumer: Rp96.8 trillion, +12.9% YoY, with NPL improving to 1.53% (from 1.61% a year earlier).
  • SoE loans: Rp156.3 trillion, +19.1% YoY, with NPL at 0.00% - by policy and structure, state-owned-enterprise lending in this book carries no disclosed non-performing balance.
  • Corporate (Non-SoE): Rp77.3 trillion, essentially flat YoY (+2.9%), while its NPL kept climbing for a third straight quarter - 3.62% (Sep 2015) → 3.78% (Mar 2016) → 4.67% (Jun 2016) → 4.78% (Sep 2016). This is the same tension the H1 2016 post flagged when Corporate's segment income swung sharply higher without matching credit-quality improvement - underlying loan quality in this specific book has now gotten worse in every single quarter this series has tracked, even as the segment's loan growth has essentially stalled.

Read together: BRI's fastest-growing lending books (Micro, SoE) are also the ones with flat-to-improving asset quality, while its slowest-growing book (Corporate Non-SoE) is the one whose credit quality keeps deteriorating - a cleaner version of the same story the H1 2016 post already surfaced, now visible for a fourth consecutive data point without the segment-income note available to confirm whether Corporate's profit recovery from that quarter has held up.

Beyond the Usual

This quarter's filing is the short-form OJK interim publication rather than the fuller audited-format statements - as with every short-form quarter this series has covered, it carries no segment note, no related-party detail, and no commitments/contingencies footnote package beyond the standard regulatory schedule. The one genuine footnote it does carry - the appropriated-reserve reclassification - is this post's main narrative (see A Second Capital Jump above), so it isn't repeated here as a separate finding.

Net Open Position more than tripled in a single quarter

BRI's disclosed Net Open Position (overall) jumped to 10.56% at September 30, 2016, from 3.29% at June 30, 2016 and 5.13% at March 31, 2016 - the highest reading this series has recorded. It remains comfortably inside Indonesia's regulatory 20% ceiling, and the filing doesn't explain the driver, but more than tripling foreign-currency exposure in one quarter is a real change in the bank's risk profile worth watching into next quarter, particularly against a rupiah that moved from Rp13,212.50/USD at June 30 to Rp13,051.00/USD at September 30 - a modest rupiah appreciation that a larger open position would have benefited from, though the filing gives no basis to say that was the intent.

Foreign ownership reversed most of the year's domestic-tilt shift in a single quarter

Foreign ownership of BRI's public float rose to 80.98% at September 30, 2016, from 78.36% at June 30, 2016 - reversing, in a single quarter, most of the multi-quarter shift toward domestic holders the Q1 2016 post first flagged (foreign share had fallen from 85.06% to 78.44% between Q4 2015 and Q1 2016). A single quarter's reversal doesn't establish a new trend on its own, but it's a genuine directional change in who's actually buying the stock, not a continuation of the domestic-tilt story from earlier in the year.

Target Valuation Range

~1.93x P/B (~10.5x P/E) - fairly valued, trading at a modest premium to where the H1 2016 post left it, entirely on the back of a share-price rally rather than any change in the underlying earnings or book-value picture.

BRI's share price (converted to the nominal terms actually quoted at the time, adjusting for the November 2017 1:5 stock split, since price data pulled today for this period reflects that split retroactively) closed around Rp11,091 on September 30, 2016 - up 13.0% from the roughly Rp9,818 close the H1 2016 post reported for June 30, 2016. That's a real move, but well short of the ~30-40% peak-to-trough threshold this series uses to warrant a dedicated stock-price section, so it's folded into the valuation read here instead. Shares outstanding remain 24,669,162,000 issued, of which 221,718,000 sit in treasury (24,447,444,000 outstanding) - unchanged from the H1 2016 post; the buyback program completed in January 2016 and there's no evidence of a new tranche this quarter.

Market cap → enterprise value Q3 2016
Share price (period-end) Rp11,091
Shares outstanding 24,447,444,000
Market capitalization Rp271,147B (~$20.78B)
Total liabilities Rp790,752B
Less: cash and equivalents Rp140,820B
Enterprise value Rp921,079B (~$70.58B)
Valuation multiple Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Change
P/E (TTM) ~9.9x ~10.5x ⚠️ up
P/B ~1.82x ~1.93x ⚠️ up
  • P/E: ~10.5x, using a genuine trailing-twelve-month EPS of Rp1,059.04 (full-year 2015's Rp1,030.43, less 9M 2015's Rp746.55, plus this quarter's actual 9M 2016 figure of Rp775.16) - a real trailing-four-quarter number rather than a rougher within-year annualization, the first quarter this series has been able to build one for BRI.
  • P/B: ~1.93x, using book value per share of ~Rp5,753 (Rp140,604,529M total equity attributable to owners ÷ 24,447,444,000 shares outstanding) - up from the H1 2016 post's ~1.82x, mechanically because equity grew a genuine 5.4% quarter-on-quarter (see Key Financial Metrics above) while the share count didn't change.

Both multiples moved up modestly from last quarter - almost entirely because the share price rose 13% while earnings and book value each grew only mid-single digits over the same window. A ~10.5x P/E against a Bank-reported Tier 1 ROE of 23.97% (down from 25.24%, but still high in absolute terms) remains a reasonable-to-cheap multiple for that level of return, though the ROE figure itself is now inflated by the same capital-base growth this quarter's central finding describes - a reader comparing this ROE to a peer bank's should keep in mind the denominator just grew from an internal reclassification, not new equity capital doing new work. No same-period peer comparison is available yet - Indonesia's other large listed banks haven't been covered for a comparable period in this series.

A full DCF still isn't included here - six quarters of tracked history, with two separate one-off capital-ratio events now complicating rather than clarifying a clean multi-year trajectory, still isn't enough to responsibly model loan growth, margin, and cost-of-equity assumptions. The peer-multiple read above, alongside Beyond the Usual, is the honest valuation lens for this quarter.


PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk's interim consolidated financial information as of September 30, 2016 and for the nine-month period then ended (with comparative September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2015 figures, per the Financial Services Authority's regulatory publication requirements), and the company's own "3Q'2016 - Financial Update Presentation."